Dan, congratulations on your success using the ball bearing pivot point. More than a few people are using this method of suspension. I am the person who started people using it . My web site is http://freeweb.pdq.net/fxc/four.htmI I have developed what i call a modified Lehman quad convex surface system for the lower and upper pivot points .The lower and the upper pivot points consist of a ball bearing resting on a convex surface instead of a flat polished bolt head. The ball is chrome nickel steel and the static surfaces are also chrome nickel steel polished to a mirror finish. WE have several of the new quad detectors running at this time and they are looking good. Time will tell. The old wire suspension is long gone on these detectors as well as the turn buckle etc Dan, I believe that it can be proven theoretically, and i have demonstrated empirically , that an increase of convexity at the pivot point can result in increase sensitivity . This makes sense because there is less surface contact between the static and mobile elements of the interface , resulting in less friction and increased isolation of the pendulum. MY modified instruments using this technology have shown remarkable improvement over the standard Lehman detector. I intend to upgrade my site and have pictures of the quad convex surface detector soon. Thanks to Professor Albert Hrubetz of Dallas, Texas for suggesting the convex to convex pivot point concept as well as the extensive research on the new super coils.. Professor Hrubetz, it may be of interest to you to know that i am currently using your role . JOHN W5AUH ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. __________________________________________________________ Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>