Hi All- A little more info on the PMD/MET seismometer. I first heard of it 2-3 years ago, as it was one of the PEPP (Princeton Earth Physics Program) http://lasker.princeton.edu/education.html seismometers along with the Guralp. I believe ~9 of the ~90 PEPP seismometers are the PMD type. I always called it the chemical seis for lack of a better name. The early PMD2's that PEPP has had, have not performed well. However, Tom Owens's South Carolina group, SCEPP, has had a good experience with the newer three component PMD machines. They have purchased around 40 3-component PMDs. At this time you cannot run SCREAM (Guralp's software) with these machines, though. I am not sure about WinQuake- As good as Scream is, many PEPP people prefer WinQuake!!!!! PMD or MET: You can see more about it at: http://www.eentec.com/PMD/pmdproductpage.htm and MET Theory at: http://www.eentec.com/PMD/ELECTROCHEMICA-1.doc US Educational Seismic Network (USESN): BTW, I attended the IRIS annual meeting in June and volunteered to serve on the US Educational Seismic Network (USESN) Committee. It consists of 9 states, which have their own high school seismic networks, PEPP related, and the PSN. I believe Gary Simila, seismologist from Cal State Northridge, suggested PSN be part of the USESN. Since I was familiar with the PSN, I seconded the motion and described many of the PSN activities. The main focus of the USESN is to effectively promote programs for educational seismographs in schools. No buddy does it better than you guys! Nevada Educational Seismic Network (NESN): I am working on putting together a 20 site network for Nevada high schools which I hope to have up and running by the beginning of 2002. Funding comes from the Nevada Earthquake Safety Council and the Nevada Public Agency Insurance Pool. The planning has been going on for over a year, and much of the design and components has come from the PSN and Larry Cochrane. These sites will be much cheaper per site (~$500) than the PEPP (~$2500) sites.....Jim Jim O'Donnell UNLV Adjunct Research AssociateHi All- A little more info on the PMD/MET seismometer. I first = heard=20 of it 2-3 years ago, as it was one of the PEPP (Princeton Earth Physics = Program)=20 http://lasker.princeton= ..edu/education.html=20 seismometers along with the Guralp. I believe ~9 of the ~90 = PEPP=20 seismometers are the PMD type. I always called it the chemical seis = for=20 lack of a better name. The early PMD2's that PEPP has had, have not=20 performed well. However, Tom Owens's South Carolina group, SCEPP, has= had=20 a good experience with the newer three component PMD machines. They = have=20 purchased around 40 3-component PMDs. At this time you cannot run = SCREAM=20 (Guralp's software) with these machines, though. I am not sure about = WinQuake-=20 As good as Scream is, many PEPP people prefer WinQuake!!!!!PMD or MET:You can see more about it at: http://www.eentec.com= /PMD/pmdproductpage.htmand MET Theory at: http://www.eentec.= com/PMD/ELECTROCHEMICA-1.docUS Educational Seismic Network (USESN):BTW, I attended the IRIS annual meeting in June and volunteered to = serve on=20 the US Educational Seismic Network (USESN) Committee. It consists of = 9=20 states, which have their own high school seismic networks, PEPP related, and=20 the PSN. I believe Gary Simila, seismologist from Cal State=20 Northridge, suggested PSN be part of the USESN. Since I was = familiar=20 with the PSN, I seconded the motion and described many of the PSN=20 activities. The main focus of the USESN is to effectively promote = programs=20 for educational seismographs in schools. No buddy does = it=20 better than you guys!Nevada Educational Seismic Network (NESN):I am working on putting together a 20 site network for Nevada high = schools=20 which I hope to have up and running by the beginning of 2002. Funding= =20 comes from the Nevada Earthquake Safety Council and the Nevada Public = Agency=20 Insurance Pool. The planning has been going on for over a year, and much = of the=20 design and components has come from the PSN and Larry Cochrane. = These=20 sites will be much cheaper per site (~$500) than the PEPP (~$2500)=20 sites.....JimJim O'DonnellUNLV Adjunct Research AssociateGeoscience Dept. & Engineering Geophysics Lab.
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>