The URL for Randall Peters' vertical seismometer needs a period between = the z and the html: http://physics.mercer.edu/hpage/new-z.html Regards, Les ----- Original Message -----=20 From: meredith lamb=20 To: psn-l@................. Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 11:23 AM Subject: Re: Verticle Sensor Design Hi Gary and all, Amateur verticals (the more popular published ones), as you've = probably noticed, are really shall we say; quite diverse in their final published suggested sensor pickup use. Obviously, one can build the = selected mechanical equivalent and substitute whatever output sensor you really know/feel comfortable making/building/using and = henceforth go from there inasfar as electronic amplification, period extension, feed back and so on....at least in what is available for = such choice. If one really gets down to the nitty-gritty...its going to be the old = coil-magnet models that 95% of the amateurs will actually build in my opinion. Complicated sensor electronics is for those that already = possess the ability, tools, material and time to devote in the building for doing so. Its too bad that the electronic circuits for = some can't be bought. Although I've not yet tried to duplicate any of the published models; = their is one in particular that (mechanically) really draws my interest and it offers a variety of improvements that I think is worth = paying ALOT more attention to. Its the Randall Peters vertical at: http://physics.mercer.edu/hpage/new-zhtml The web site details offer up very significant pivot friction lowering = points; but doesn't delve into any amateur construction details. If one mechanically "thinks outside the box", its likely that a wide = variety of some substitutions of material could be arrived at. Note the front two leveling screws; that setup will help give more = mechanically stability. A square frame overall, can help for stability and afixing whatever sensor arrangement thats desired. The = spring "looks" like a common hardware store door spring; but it may have been cut to a certain length (?). How would it be with a coil-magnet sensor (?), I really don't know; = but I'am sure it will be much better in overall mass enertia=20 sensitivity and the length of the period will be noteably longer than = any other low cost model thats presently around. Take care, Meredith =20 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Gary Lindgren= wrote: With all the discussion about the Sprengnether lately it got me = thinking that I need to get my plans together for a vertical sensor. Not = to long ago someone mentioned a good design for a vertical seismometer. = Is there a picture handy and some words of advice. Thank you, Gary Gary Lindgren 585 Lincoln Ave Palo Alto CA 94301 650-326-0655 www.blue-eagle-technologies.com cymonsplace.blogspot.com=20 The URL for Randall Peters' vertical = seismometer=20 needs a period between the z and the html:Regards,Les----- Original Message -----From:=20 meredith lambSent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 = 11:23=20 AMSubject: Re: Verticle Sensor = DesignHi Gary and all,
Amateur verticals (the more = popular=20 published ones), as you've probably noticed, are really shall we say; = quite=20 diverse in their final
published suggested sensor pickup use. = =20 Obviously, one can build the selected mechanical equivalent and = substitute=20 whatever output
sensor you really know/feel comfortable=20 making/building/using and henceforth go from there inasfar as = electronic=20 amplification, period
extension, feed back and so on....at least in = what is=20 available for such choice.
If one really gets down to the=20 nitty-gritty...its going to be the old coil-magnet models that 95% of = the=20 amateurs will actually build in
my opinion. Complicated = sensor=20 electronics is for those that already possess the ability, tools, = material=20 and time to devote in the
building for doing so. Its = too bad=20 that the electronic circuits for some can't be bought.
Although = I've=20 not yet tried to duplicate any of the published models; their is one = in=20 particular that (mechanically) really draws my
interest and it = offers a=20 variety of improvements that I think is worth paying ALOT more = attention=20 to. Its the Randall Peters vertical at:
http://physics.mercer.edu/hpage/new-zhtml
The = web=20 site details offer up very significant pivot friction lowering points; = but=20 doesn't delve into any amateur construction details.
If one = mechanically=20 "thinks outside the box", its likely that a wide variety of some = substitutions=20 of material could be arrived at.
Note the front two leveling = screws;=20 that setup will help give more mechanically stability. A square = frame=20 overall, can help for
stability and afixing whatever sensor = arrangement=20 thats desired. The spring "looks" like a common hardware store = door=20 spring; but
it may have been cut to a certain length = (?).
How would=20 it be with a coil-magnet sensor (?), I really don't know; but I'am = sure it=20 will be much better in overall mass enertia
sensitivity and the = length of=20 the period will be noteably longer than any other low cost model thats = presently around.
Take care, = Meredith
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Gary = Lindgren <gel@.................> wrote:
With all the discussion about the Sprengnether lately it got me = thinking=20 that I need to get my plans together for a vertical sensor. Not to = long ago=20 someone mentioned a good design for a vertical seismometer. Is there = a=20 picture handy and some words of advice.
Thank you,
Gary
Gary=20 Lindgren
585 = Lincoln=20 Ave
Palo = Alto CA=20 94301
650-326-0655
www.blue-eagle-technologies.com
=