Ted -

This appears to be a local event nearer to HLID than MSO.  Was the  
signal strong enough on all three channels that you got a clear  
indication of the P wave first movement.  If so, have you plotted the  
incoming ray path to your station.

Bob Hancock


On May 13, 2009, at 5:54 PM, tchannel wrote:

> Hailey, Idaho  http://mbmgquake.mtech.edu/earthworm/wavef_disp/HLID_SPZ_US.2009051300.gif
>
> Missoula, Montana  http://mbmgquake.mtech.edu/earthworm/wavef_disp/MSO_SPZ_US.2009051300.gif
>
> Very confused..???.
>
> I received a signature on all three sensors, Hailey Idaho and  
> Montana received it also....The only event posted was a 5.7m Tonga,  
> but the P arrive one minute too late for this to match.
>
> Did anyone get this one?
>
> My signal also look too short for that distance,  This appears to be  
> much closer than Tonga @5400 miles.   Perhaps Idaho, Utah???    
> Sometime the USGS is slow to report Local events.
>
>    My clock is correct.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Ted

Ted =
-

This appears to be a local event nearer to =
HLID than MSO.  Was the signal strong enough on all three channels =
that you got a clear indication of the P wave first movement.  If =
so, have you plotted the incoming ray path to your =
station.

Bob =
Hancock


On May 13, 2009, at 5:54 =
PM, tchannel wrote:

Hailey, =
Idaho  http://mbmgquake.mtech.edu/earthworm/wavef_disp/HLID_SPZ_US.2009=
051300.gif
 
Missoula, Montana  http://mbmgquake.mtech.edu/earthworm/wavef_disp/MSO_SPZ_US.20090=
51300.gif
 
Very confused..???.
 
I =
received a signature on all three sensors, Hailey Idaho and Montana =
received it also....The only event posted was a 5.7m Tonga, but the P =
arrive one minute too late for this to match.
 
Did anyone get this one?
 
My =
signal also look too short for that distance,  This appears to be =
much closer than Tonga @5400 miles.   Perhaps Idaho, =
Utah???   Sometime the USGS is slow to report Local =
events.
 
   My clock is =
correct.
 
Thanks,
 
 
Ted

=