I still see it on the recent 19:00 UST Valparasio quake...it may be due to oscillation of crust...this territory is new to me.

----- Original Message -----
From: Barry Lotz 
Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 12:50
Subject: Re: Chilean earthquakes
To: psn-l@..............

> Thomas
> I was wondering the same thing. I would think the 6.9 event ~1.5 
> hrs later would have showed up.
> 
> Regards
> Barry
> http://www.seismicvault.com
> 
> --- On Sat, 2/27/10, Thomas Dick  
> wrote:
> From: Thomas Dick 
> Subject: Chilean earthquakes
> To: "psn-l@.............." 
> Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010, 8:35 AM
> 
> Has anyone else noticed that the mag 6 plus quakes after the 
> original 8.8 don't seem to be coming through as distinctly as I 
> would expect?
> __________________________________________________________
> 
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
> 
> To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the 
> body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
> See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
> 
I still see it on the recent 19=3A00 UST Valparasio quake=2E=2E=2Eit may=
 be due to oscillation of crust=2E=2E=2Ethis territory is new to me=2E=3C=
br=3E=3Cbr=3E----- Original Message -----=3Cbr=3EFrom=3A Barry Lotz =26l=
t=3Bbarry=5Flotz=40sbcglobal=2Enet=26gt=3B=3Cbr=3EDate=3A Saturday=2C Fe=
bruary 27=2C 2010 12=3A50=3Cbr=3ESubject=3A Re=3A Chilean earthquakes=3C=
br=3ETo=3A psn-l=40webtronics=2Ecom=3Cbr=3E=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B Thomas=3Cbr=3E=
=26gt=3B I was wondering the same thing=2E I would think the 6=2E9 event=
 =7E1=2E5 =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B hrs later would have showed up=2E=3Cbr=3E=26g=
t=3B =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B Regards=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B Barry=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B http=
=3A//www=2Eseismicvault=2Ecom=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B --- On Sa=
t=2C 2/27/10=2C Thomas Dick =26lt=3Bdickthomas01=40insightbb=2Ecom=26gt=3B=
 =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B wrote=3A=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B From=3A Thomas Dick =26lt=3Bd=
ickthomas01=40insightbb=2Ecom=26gt=3B=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B Subject=3A Chilean=
 earthquakes=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B To=3A =22psn-l=40webtronics=2Ecom=22 =26lt=3B=
psn-l=40webtronics=2Ecom=26gt=3B=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B Date=3A Saturday=2C Feb=
ruary 27=2C 2010=2C 8=3A35 AM=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B Has anyon=
e else noticed that the mag 6 plus quakes after the =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B ori=
ginal 8=2E8 don=27t seem to be coming through as distinctly as I =3Cbr=3E=
=26gt=3B would expect=3F=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=3C=
br=3E=26gt=3B =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-=
L)=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUE=
ST=40SEISMICNET=2ECOM with the =3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B body of the message (fir=
st line only)=3A unsubscribe=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B See http=3A//www=2Eseismicn=
et=2Ecom/maillist=2Ehtml for more information=2E=3Cbr=3E=26gt=3B