PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: Chapman's sensor Design
From: "GPayton" gpayton@.............
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:46:29 -0500
Thank you Kay & Bob. Both have been very helpful.
I've ordered the 38 ga.wire and glass epoxy unclad PCB to make the coil.
After checking into the cost of the SEP sensor from the UK, and (estimating
the possible weight) estimating the shipping from the UK to me in Texas; it
would be almost $700 US dollars! OUCH
If they read the PSN site: I wished they would get a U.S. distributer. I
know they would benefit in sales.
So, I am going to try to build one of this type. I might say that I tried
in the 2008-9 period, before moving to Texas. I do not have near the
facilities or tools available now that I did then. (Say a prayer for me.)
It is going to be difficult. However, my alternatives are few.
Bob, I guess that I am a maverick. In looking at these various designs and
drawings, I can't help but wonder about possible modifications. For
instance, the number of turns in a coil. To me, for a given amount of gauss
increasing the number of turns cutting the flux, the angle that they cut and
the speed determine the output voltage. So, following drawings EXACTLY may
be a matter of choice. The amplification of that output is a factor too.
Enough of my soapbox speech. I appreciate everyone's input, and I am sure
it helpful for other novices too.
Best Regards,
Jerry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob McClure
To: psn-l@..............
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: Chapman's sensor Design
I prefer the following block magnets:
http://www.gaussboys.com/ndfeb-magnets/B5012.html
Model: B5012
Size: 50mm long x 25mm wide x 12mm thick
Price: $11.00 each
An assembly of two quarter-inch thick steel plates, four magnets, and a
one-quarter inch gap will yield a field of almost 7,500 gauss. A rectangular
coil of 1100 turns of #38 wire will yield an output of ~80 volts per meter
per second. The coil resistance is only 340 ohms, and you can easily use
resistive shunt damping with negligible loss of output.
See: http://sites.google.com/site/bobmcclure90/horiz
Bob
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Kay Wyatt wrote:
Jerry,
they are magnitized through the thickness. I order mine through K&J
Magnetics at http://www.kjmagnetics.com
The part number is
BX0X02
1" x 1" x 1/8" thick
Grade N42 - Nickel Plated
Magnetized thru Thickness
Hope this helps.
Kay
----- Original Message -----
From: GPayton
To: psn-l@..............
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 8:30 PM
Subject: Chapman's sensor Design
Looking closely at the drawings on this page, I am not certain about
the magnetization of the required sets of magnets. Are they magnetized from
end-to-end or through the thickness?
Most magnets I have found online, so far, have been through the
thickness, but I am not sure what is shown on the drawing. Anyone know?
Thanks,
Jerry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the link to Chris Chapman's coil design and instructions
http://www.jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/lehman/index.html
Thank you Kay & Bob. Both have been very =
helpful.
I've ordered the 38 ga.wire and glass epoxy unclad PCB to make the=20
coil.
After checking into the cost of the SEP sensor from the UK, and =
(estimating=20
the possible weight) estimating the shipping from the UK to me in Texas; =
it=20
would be almost $700 US dollars! OUCH
If they read the PSN site: I =
wished they=20
would get a U.S. distributer. I know they would =
benefit in=20
sales.
So, I am going to try to build one of this type. I might say =
that I=20
tried in the 2008-9 period, before moving to Texas. I do not =
have=20
near the facilities or tools available now that I did then. (Say a =
prayer=20
for me.) It is going to be difficult. However, my =
alternatives are=20
few.
Bob, I guess that I am a maverick. In looking at these =
various=20
designs and drawings, I can't help but wonder about possible=20
modifications. For instance, the number of turns in a coil. =
To me,=20
for a given amount of gauss increasing the number of turns cutting the =
flux, the=20
angle that they cut and the speed determine the output voltage. =
So,=20
following drawings EXACTLY may be a matter of choice. The =
amplification of=20
that output is a factor too.
Enough of my soapbox speech. I appreciate everyone's input, =
and I am=20
sure it helpful for other novices too.
Best Regards,
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]