Thanks for the answer Larry.

WinQuake is producing the same LQ and LR times as USGS. The problem is
mine, its something to do how i=C2=B4m suppose to read the table, but i fol=
lowed
the same method for P and S tables and those are ok.

I simply copy paste the values from line "# Travel-time/amplitude for z
=3D    20.00" in LQ.jb.
First line correponds to 0deg, so for the time travel of exacly 111deg, i
just look for line nr "111".

This is a image for LQ.jb table which explains the issue (USGS is for
+-111deg LQ Time travel) :
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15802004/LQ.png


With so many simulations i=C2=B4m bit lost, the issue should be simple to
resolve, but cant figure out.

Best Regards.




2013/3/27 Larry Cochrane 

> Hi Tiago,
>
> I'm not sure why you are seeing this discrepancy. All of the *.jb tables
> used by WinQuake use the same format. Does WinQuake produce the same LQ a=
nd
> LR times as you program or the USGS numbers?
>
> Regards,
> Larry Cochrane
> Webtronics
>
> On 3/27/2013 8:39 AM, Tiago A. wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I=E6=89=89e been developing a online "Interactive Time Travel" for some =
time, P
>> and S tables
>>
>> works pretty close (need to tune up somethings)..but cant get LQ and LR
>> times match
>> USGS Time Travel Calculator, example:
>>
>> Todays Taiwan Eq, (+-) 111 deg.
>>
>> My Tool:
>> LQ 3522s 03:02:02
>> LR 4025s 03:10:25
>>
>> USGS
>>
>> LQ 2824.90s 02:50:24
>> LR 3135.24s 02:55:35
>>
>> I=E6=83=B4 using P.jb, S.jb, LQ.jb and LR.jb tables found in WinQuake, i=
f i go to
>> the LQ.jb
>>
>> table and locate depth:20km ; 111deg, i found:3494s, which is pretty
>> close to my
>> tool, but far for USGS results (and realistic results), to match USGS
>> results i=E6=89=89e to
>>
>> look to 90deg corresponding to 2827s.
>>
>> Does LQ.jb and LR.jb tables differ from P.jb and S.jb tables?
>> Does anyone have clue where can be the problem?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Tiago.
>>
> ______________________________**____________________________
>
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSNLIST)
>
> To leave this list email PSNLIST-REQUEST@.............. with the body of
> the message (first line only): unsubscribe
> See http://www.seismicnet.com/**maillist.htmlfor more information.
>
Thanks for the answer Larry.

WinQuake is producing the same LQ and L=
R times as USGS. The problem is mine, its something to do how i=C2=B4m supp=
ose to read the table, but i followed the same method for P and S tables an=
d those are ok.


I simply copy paste the values from line "# Travel-time/amplitude =
for z =3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 20.00" in LQ.jb.
First line correponds =
to 0deg, so for the time travel of exacly 111deg, i just look for line nr &=
quot;111".


This is a image for LQ.jb table which explains the issue (USGS is for +=
-111deg LQ Time travel) :
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15802004/LQ.png


With so many s=
imulations i=C2=B4m bit lost, the issue should be simple to resolve, but ca=
nt figure out.


Best Regards.


=C2=A0

2013/=
3/27 Larry Cochrane <lcochrane@..............>

Hi Tiago,



I'm not sure why you are seeing this discrepancy. All of the *.jb table=
s used by WinQuake use the same format. Does WinQuake produce the same LQ a=
nd LR times as you program or the USGS numbers?



Regards,

Larry Cochrane

Webtronics



On 3/27/2013 8:39 AM, Tiago A. wrote:


Hi.



I=E6=89=89e been developing a online "Interactive Time Travel" fo=
r some time, P and S tables


works pretty close (need to tune up somethings)..but cant get LQ and LR tim=
es match

USGS Time Travel Calculator, example:



Todays Taiwan Eq, (+-) 111 deg.



My Tool:

LQ 3522s 03:02:02

LR 4025s 03:10:25



USGS



LQ 2824.90s 02:50:24

LR 3135.24s 02:55:35



I=E6=83=B4 using P.jb, S.jb, LQ.jb and LR.jb tables found in WinQuake, if i=
 go to the LQ.jb


table and locate depth:20km ; 111deg, i found:3494s, which is pretty close =
to my

tool, but far for USGS results (and realistic results), to match USGS resul=
ts i=E6=89=89e to


look to 90deg corresponding to 2827s.



Does LQ.jb and LR.jb tables differ from P.jb and S.jb tables?

Does anyone have clue where can be the problem?



Best Regards,

Tiago.


__________________________________________________________



Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSNLIST)



To leave this list email PSNLIST-REQUEST@.............. with the body of the m=
essage (first line only): unsubscribe

See h=
ttp://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.