Jim wrote: > It depends on what exactly you want to record. I want to record only local events, and I'd like to get as much useful data on these events as reasonably possible without spending thousands on individual sensors. I guess the real question I have is this: what would be a good combination of sensors for this purpose? I am getting both the 1hz and 4.5hz geophones as per the group buy. This leaves me one extra channel on the amp/filter board, so I am wondering which type of additional geophone would be good to add as a third? Then, in addition to geophones, I am looking for other strong motion sensors that would be good for local recording, as a complement to the geos. > Your geophones should be good for most local events up to the point > of felt shaking. Okay, that is good, since I should detect the smaller local activity. > The Analog Devices accelerometers overlap this a little bit and would > then be good up to the point of total destruction. Well I think they are fine for me then. I understand that they will not be useful at all for teleseismic events, and therefore are not what most amateurs would want to use. But in my case they might be good for local activity (only during large events). Let's hope I don't get to the point of total destruction any time soon :) Since I can get the ADXL202s and ADXL105s in the form of cheap and easy eval boards, I think I'll set up a few of them here, and work towards connecting them to a microcontroller with ethernet as I described earlier. Analog also provides free samples so I already have some of these freebies on the way. If anything it should help me to learn about accelerometers, and sanity test the sensor <--> ethernet idea. It sure would be neat to have say 16 of these plugged directly into a 10-base-T hub, each with their own IP address and embedded web server. I could have one of my unix boxes run a cron job and grab the data logs. Also, I could use flash ROM on the microcontrollers to aid in saving data in the event of a complete power outage. One thing I like about the ADXL202 is that it has digital output, therefore requiring no A/D conversion, and easy to connect to a microcontroller or other host. In the meantime I got some suggestions for sources other more sensitive accelerometers. Thanks everyone for all the help. This stuff is very, very interesting. -- Doug _____________________________________________________________________ Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>