Re: System Configuration

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view
Larry Cochrane (lcochrane@..............)
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:35:15 -0700



From: "Larry Cochrane" <lcochrane@..............>
Subject: Re: System Configuration
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:35:15 -0700

Karl,

This option is on the WinSDR todo list. Unfortunately I do not have a lot of
time to work on WinSDR (or WinQuake) right now so it will be awhile before I
can add this feature to the program.

-Larry

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karl Cunningham" <karlc@..........>
To: <winsdr@..............>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject: System Configuration

> This is probably a question for Larry, but thought it might have interest
> for the gang.
>
> For a while I've been wanting to get away from running the serial cable
> between SDR server and Winsdr. It's not that I have anything against
> serial cables, but I have an ethernet cable running over the same path and
> I'd like to use it for the SDR data connection too. Let me propose a
> system configuration and see what you think...
>
> 1. Computer A is located near the seismometer, running the A/D card and
> SDR Server, powered from an UPS.
> 2. Computer B, sitting next to Computer A running WinSDR, powered from the
> same UPS as Computer A. A short serial cable connects the two. WinSDR is
> set to act as a server over TCP/IP. This comptuer has a moderate-size hard
> disk and only keeps a few days of record files.
> 3. Computer C, sitting in the house is running WinSDR, which is configured
> as a client to receive data from Computer B. This comptuer has a big hard
> disk for a month or two of record files and serves as my main WinSDR
> display. It also serves replay requests to WinQuake.
> 4. Router/Firewall forwards TCP/IP request from WinSDR clients to comptuer
> B.
>
> Larry, I think you mentioned something a while back about a future
> enhancement where a WinSDR system operating as a client could make requests
> to a WinSDR server to fill in gaps in its record files. Did I understand
> that correctly? If so, is that still a possibility? If it is, Comptuer C
> wouldn't have to have an UPS since it could "catch up" after a power
> failure.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks.
> Karl Cunningham
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List WinSDR
>
> To leave this list email WINSDR-REQUEST@.............. with
> the body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
>

.



New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view
This archive was generated on Tue Jun 10 2003 - 01:35:16 Pacific Daylight Time